• We are officially moved over to Discourse.
    Autoflower Discourse"
    You will have to create a new login for the new site!
    This current Xenforo-based forum will be preserved as a read-only archive going forward with efforts to better categorize and tag original and canonical content.
    The URL autoflower.org will soon point to the new Discourse site; so we'll be back to business in a few days!
    Send Son of Hobbes a private message if you have any questions!

Peat vs Coco Coir

Seems like, if we were serious about halting the destruction of nature, we'd have to turn our backs to technology. Not a very attractive proposition
 
Seems like, if we were serious about halting the destruction of nature, we'd have to turn our backs to technology. Not a very attractive proposition
More so that the ethical production of resources drops profit margins, which isn't attractive to companies. They know you'll buy it anyways cause its in everything, so why would they change it?
 
Seems like, if we were serious about halting the destruction of nature, we'd have to turn our backs to technology. Not a very attractive proposition
Or rather, "if we were serious about halting the destruction of nature, we" should invest and work more on the technology, get it right, fix the problems; ideally, eliminate the causes of environmental damage.

For example, current leading coco products could be considered a rather recent high-tech product (vs. peat which is mined, generally with no further chemical processing or modification). The coco is now generally processed and buffered, often using proprietary/trade secret methods, and has high-tech quality control throughout processing. So, perhaps modern coco products are examples where advancing technology (including understanding what works) supports avoidance and reduced use of worse environmental options.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top