• We are officially moved over to Discourse.
    Autoflower Discourse"
    You will have to create a new login for the new site!
    This current Xenforo-based forum will be preserved as a read-only archive going forward with efforts to better categorize and tag original and canonical content.
    The URL autoflower.org will soon point to the new Discourse site; so we'll be back to business in a few days!
    Send Son of Hobbes a private message if you have any questions!

Indoor Rhyce Saroni grows Triangle Dragon

151fae7b12852f455271693344009c50.jpg
654a93602b945889a6de04ffe989e5be.jpg
 
Tha weighed in at 34 g.... If I'm right this girl will yield 3.5 oz dry... Many times I've found that the gram weight of the largest secondary only in ounces... So 30 g = 3 oz for example... Let's see if it holds true for this branchy girl...
 
Spot on once again! Just shy of 12.5 oz. which should net 25% of that value dry so something more than 3 oz ! Super haul of sweet smelling weed!
 
Tha weighed in at 34 g.... If I'm right this girl will yield 3.5 oz dry... Many times I've found that the gram weight of the largest secondary only in ounces... So 30 g = 3 oz for example... Let's see if it holds true for this branchy girl...
I'm not getting what you are saying.
 
I'm not getting what you are saying.

f'ing phone...

So I have found that if I weight the heaviest branch and it's 60 grams wet... if I divide by ten, the result is the approximate total dry harvest weight in ounces... Like a 60 gram branch usually means that the plant will yield 6 ounces... just a rule of thumb and an odd observation I made a while ago and have kept track... it is not exactly correct but pretty close for ballpark yield estimate...
 
f'ing phone...

So I have found that if I weight the heaviest branch and it's 60 grams wet... if I divide by ten, the result is the approximate total dry harvest weight in ounces... Like a 60 gram branch usually means that the plant will yield 6 ounces... just a rule of thumb and an odd observation I made a while ago and have kept track... it is not exactly correct but pretty close for ballpark yield estimate...
Ok, I understand now,
 
Back
Top